Skip to content

Compare

SiteRune vs PageSpeed Insights

· Configuration notes, not a newsroom.

PageSpeed Insights is Lighthouse on a Google URL. SiteRune does not run Chrome. Use PSI for LCP/INP proof. Use SiteRune for headers, robots, schema, and the CMS playbook.

SiteRune vs PageSpeed InsightsPA

Different instruments

PageSpeed Insights executes a browser, records a filmstrip, and scores Core Web Vitals in lab (and field if CrUX has you). That is the right proof after you change a hero image.

SiteRune fetches HTML and headers, walks interior URLs, fingerprints the CMS, and writes nginx / Vercel / WordPress snippets. It will not give you INP. It will tell you GPTBot is banned and /docs is noindex.

When to use which

  • PSI: you shipped next/image and need LCP in writing.
  • SiteRune: you need the configuration chapter and a paste-ready CSP/HSTS/llms.txt.
  • Both: SiteRune playbook first, then PSI on the money URL to prove runtime.

Capability table

SiteRune compared with PageSpeed Insights
CapabilitySiteRunePageSpeed Insights
Lab Core Web VitalsNoYes
Field CrUX when availableNoYes
Multi-page crawlYesOne URL
Security headersYesNo
robots.txt / AI-bot policyYesNo
CMS-specific playbookYesNo
Paste-ready config filesYesNo
FreeYesYes

FAQ

Does SiteRune replace pagespeed?

No. Use the comparison table. SiteRune is a hosted configuration brief with CMS dialect and ship files. It does not replace rank tracking, backlink graphs, lab Core Web Vitals, or a desktop site-wide crawl.

What does a SiteRune scan actually fetch?

HTML and headers from this vantage point, robots.txt, sitemap, llms.txt, security.txt, and a polite walk of same-origin interiors. No headless Chrome. No exploits.

Run it on a live URL

Same scan engine. Guest scans stay free.

https://